Door Notes
Browse
PROFESSION / 13

Military officer

Compare +
Explore this career map →

THE PEOPLE & THE RECORD

A commission opened a door. Assignments and command could still be restricted.

Expanded history4 sourced episodes

Black Americans pressed for officer training, earned commissions and led units within segregated services. These Army and Marine Corps examples distinguish an individual commission from the later policy and work of service integration.

Field records. A connection to your workplace needs its own evidence.

Scope & research limits

Four episodes in Army and Marine Corps service and federal policy. They do not establish the commissioning, assignment or promotion history of every branch or unit.

  1. June–October 191701

    Advocacy secures an Army officer-training camp for Black candidates

    W. E. B. Du Bois, the NAACP, Howard University advocates and the Fort Des Moines candidates

    On October 15, 639 graduates received commissions and subsequently served in the United States and France.

    National Park Service · Fort Des Moines: A Series of Firsts in Wartime Service
    Decision, outcome & evidence 1 source
    Barrier or decision at stake
    Black candidates faced restricted training and command opportunities in a segregated Army.
    Who made the decision
    The U.S. Army selected Fort Des Moines; the Adjutant General issued commissions to graduates.
    What changed
    Following advocacy, the Army admitted 1,250 Black candidates to training in June 1917.
    Where the evidence stops
    Graduates could command Black infantry units only, received no artillery or cavalry training there, and were commissioned no higher than captain.
  2. 1942–194502

    Charity Adams moves from officer training to overseas command

    Charity Adams and the Black women in the first WAAC officer class

    She later led the 6888th Central Postal Directory Battalion overseas, directing its work on the European mail backlog.

    U.S. Army · Historical Sustainment Leaders Honored with Gregg-Adams Redesignation
    Decision, outcome & evidence 1 source
    Barrier or decision at stake
    Adams and her Black classmates trained in a separate platoon even while much of their instruction was integrated.
    Who made the decision
    Army authorities selected and trained Women’s Army Auxiliary Corps officers, then assigned Adams leadership responsibilities.
    What changed
    Adams completed officer training in August 1942 and commanded a company preparing Black women for service.
    Where the evidence stops
    The WAAC was initially auxiliary service; the later WAC and this documented command should not be read as unrestricted access for all Black women.
  3. November 10, 194503

    Frederick Branch earns a Marine Corps commission after an earlier rejection

    Frederick Clinton Branch and the commanding officer who recommended him

    He became a second lieutenant in 1945, the first Black Marine officer identified by the Corps, and later reached captain.

    Marine Corps Base Quantico · Celebrating the Contributions of Frederick Branch
    Decision, outcome & evidence 1 source
    Barrier or decision at stake
    His initial officer-school application was denied after he entered through segregated training at Montford Point.
    Who made the decision
    Marine Corps authorities admitted Branch to Officer Candidates School and commissioned him.
    What changed
    A commanding officer’s recommendation gave Branch another route to officer training.
    Where the evidence stops
    This individual commission did not end segregation or prove that other applicants received the same access.
  4. July 26, 194804

    Executive Order 9981 makes equal treatment a service-wide policy

    Black service members; President Harry S. Truman; committee chair Charles Fahy

    The committee reviewed service practices and submitted its final report, Freedom to Serve, in May 1950.

    National Archives · Executive Order 9981
    Decision, outcome & evidence 1 source
    Barrier or decision at stake
    Racially segregated service rules and practices continued after World War II.
    Who made the decision
    Truman issued the order as president and commander in chief; the services were responsible for implementing it.
    What changed
    The order declared equal treatment and opportunity and established a committee to examine military rules and recommend changes.
    Where the evidence stops
    The order was a policy change, not immediate integration of every unit; actual assignments and promotions require branch and unit records.
01
ORIGIN / Institutions in this record
Context & scope

Training, commissions and integration

World War I through service integration

Context, scope & sources

The Army’s training camp at Fort Des Moines prepared Black officers during World War I. The armed services later integrated under federal policy. Training and commissioning remained military functions as the rules governing access changed.

02
GATE / Separate decisions shape access
Context & scope

Service selection and commissioning

Current commissioned service

Context, scope & sources

Officer candidates enter through several routes, including service academies, ROTC and officer candidate schools. The service sets training and eligibility requirements and awards the commission. College admission alone does not confer officer status.

03
TREND / MEASURED

Representation over time

Active-duty commissioned officers

Black maleBlack female

Coverage 2014–2023. Dots mark reported years. Gaps stay open.

2014–2021 definition. Black is the published race category, with Hispanic ethnicity tabulated separately. Men or women divided by all active-component commissioned officers in the Army, Navy, Marine Corps and Air Force at fiscal year-end. Reserve, warrant and Coast Guard officers are outside the denominator. The Army did not report a multiracial category.

2022 definition. Black is the published race category, with Hispanic ethnicity tabulated separately. Men or women divided by all active-component commissioned officers in the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force and Space Force at fiscal year-end. Reserve, warrant and Coast Guard officers are outside the denominator. The Army did not report a multiracial category.

2023 definition. Black is the published race category, with Hispanic ethnicity tabulated separately. Men or women divided by all active-component commissioned officers in the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force and Space Force at fiscal year-end. Reserve, warrant and Coast Guard officers are outside the denominator. The Army reports multiracial officers separately in this edition.

All definitions & source tables

Black is the published race category, with Hispanic ethnicity tabulated separately. Men or women divided by all active-component commissioned officers in the Army, Navy, Marine Corps and Air Force at fiscal year-end. Reserve, warrant and Coast Guard officers are outside the denominator. The Army did not report a multiracial category.

Black is the published race category, with Hispanic ethnicity tabulated separately. Men or women divided by all active-component commissioned officers in the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force and Space Force at fiscal year-end. Reserve, warrant and Coast Guard officers are outside the denominator. The Army did not report a multiracial category.

Black is the published race category, with Hispanic ethnicity tabulated separately. Men or women divided by all active-component commissioned officers in the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force and Space Force at fiscal year-end. Reserve, warrant and Coast Guard officers are outside the denominator. The Army reports multiracial officers separately in this edition.

View the numbers
YearGroupEstimateSource table
2023Black female2.8%Population Representation in the Military Services · FY 2023 · Table B-25, Active Component Commissioned Officer Gains and Corps
2023Black male5.7%Population Representation in the Military Services · FY 2023 · Table B-25, Active Component Commissioned Officer Gains and Corps
2022Black female2.7%Population Representation in the Military Services · FY 2022 · Table B-25, Active Component Commissioned Officer Gains and Corps
2022Black male5.7%Population Representation in the Military Services · FY 2022 · Table B-25, Active Component Commissioned Officer Gains and Corps
2021Black female2.7%Population Representation in the Military Services · FY 2021 · Table B-25, Active Component Commissioned Officer Gains and Corps
2021Black male5.7%Population Representation in the Military Services · FY 2021 · Table B-25, Active Component Commissioned Officer Gains and Corps
2020Black female2.7%Population Representation in the Military Services · FY 2020 · Table B-25, Active Component Commissioned Officer Gains and Corps
2020Black male5.6%Population Representation in the Military Services · FY 2020 · Table B-25, Active Component Commissioned Officer Gains and Corps
2019Black female2.6%Population Representation in the Military Services · FY 2019 · Table B-25, Active Component Commissioned Officer Gains and Corps
2019Black male5.6%Population Representation in the Military Services · FY 2019 · Table B-25, Active Component Commissioned Officer Gains and Corps
2018Black female2.6%Population Representation in the Military Services · FY 2018 · Table B-25, Active Component Commissioned Officer Gains and Corps
2018Black male5.6%Population Representation in the Military Services · FY 2018 · Table B-25, Active Component Commissioned Officer Gains and Corps
2017Black female2.6%Population Representation in the Military Services · FY 2017 · Table B-25, Active Component Commissioned Officer Gains and Corps
2017Black male5.6%Population Representation in the Military Services · FY 2017 · Table B-25, Active Component Commissioned Officer Gains and Corps
2016Black female2.7%Population Representation in the Military Services · FY 2016 · Table B-25, Active Component Commissioned Officer Gains and Corps
2016Black male5.6%Population Representation in the Military Services · FY 2016 · Table B-25, Active Component Commissioned Officer Gains and Corps
2015Black female2.7%Population Representation in the Military Services · FY 2015 · Table B-25, Active Component Commissioned Officer Gains and Corps
2015Black male5.7%Population Representation in the Military Services · FY 2015 · Table B-25, Active Component Commissioned Officer Gains and Corps
2014Black female2.7%Population Representation in the Military Services · FY 2014 · Table B-25, Active Component Commissioned Officer Gains and Corps
2014Black male5.8%Population Representation in the Military Services · FY 2014 · Table B-25, Active Component Commissioned Officer Gains and Corps
04
RESEARCH QUESTION

When did commissioning lead to assignments, promotion and command in each branch?

Field history is not proof of an individual hiring route.

See what is still open ↗
SHARE THIS RECORD

Military officer

Door Notes research card for Military officer